*John M. Agosta*

This paper gives an algebraic derivation of the posterior for both the noisy-or and naive Bayes models, as a function of both input messages and probability table parameters. By examining these functions we show a technique where the naive Bayes model may be used to approximate a logical-OR, rather than its typical interpretation as a logical-AND. The technique is to avoid the use of disconfirming evidence in the naive Bayes model. A comparison with the posterior function for the noisy-or shows the quality of the logical-OR naive Bayes approximation. This approximation is key to the assumption of the underlying tree structure in a certain class of diagnostic Bayes’ networks, where the tree structure mimics an is-a hierarchy. We argue that this is the correct causal structure. An example of applying the Bayes’ network model to network intrusion detection illustrates this. This assumption that a tree-structured diagnostic Bayes’ network can be formulated from an is-a hierarchy is a useful elicitation tool. We have addressed the quality of the numeric approximation in this assumption; the exact nature of cause in an is-a hierarchy remains an open question.

This page is copyrighted by AAAI. All rights reserved. Your use of this site constitutes acceptance of all of AAAI's terms and conditions and privacy policy.