As educators, we have high hopes for Electronic Tangibles (ETs), we expect ETs to:

• Interest more students in the study of computing
• Broaden students' views of computing
• Invite non-majors to learn something about the computing
• Attract students to computer science as a major
• Help students learn about particular ETs
• Attract students to our classes by incorporating a flashy ET in the course material
• Improve student understanding of some difficult topics
• Maintain student interest throughout the class

However some important questions arise: Can we and should we extend these benefits throughout the K-20 curriculum? And if we can't, are we guilty of bait-and-switch?